My take on the conference
I generally would like to attend this kind of conferences mainly to know the latest trend, connect with the developers, to get to know the new products from various organizations etc. This one is a very good from this perspective. I thought following were the positives about this conference:
- well organized events
- well known speakers from all around the world
- large number of participants from various organizations
- good amount of company stalls
- food was horrible
- the recorded sessions and the presentation slides DVD arrives 45 days after the conference. I think, this is too long
Quite a few java topics were being discussed, but the one which caught me this time was Groovy, and particularly sessions from Venkat Subramaniam. I kind of became curious about Groovy and followed Venkat and attended all his sessions. I had a very little information about Groovy prior to this conference and all the Groovy sessions were very good and informative.
Groovy
- has got all the advantages of dynamic languages such as nature of scripting, dynamic types, etc.
- is very expressive - has the power of expressing lot of things using simple statements
- supports closure
- less ceremonial code
- good choice to write DSLs
Nevertheless, it does no harm to learn new languages. And I have started learning Groovy.
0 comments:
Post a Comment